October 9th, 2009
Couples Retreat Reviewed by CJ Henderson
![]() |
As you all know, the one good thing about my job as
a film critic is that I don’t have to go see any pictures that I don’t
want to see. That’s why it might seem to some that I have love everything
that gets released (or that I’m grabbing the old payola at every opportunity).
Since my wife and I both enjoy romantic comedies, I accept passes to any
that come along. And, I’m not saying that was a mistake with this week’s
film, but it wasn’t the greatest night out we’ve ever had, either.
Perhaps I should stop meandering around the topic and get down to discussing "Couples Retreat." After all, that’s why we’re here. Right? The story: This is the tale of four couples. They live somewhere in that vague mid-western area of the country Hollywood refers to as "fly-over country." Don’t worry, the filmmakers here would never risk boring you by making a film about something as dreary as the place where most of you live. They know better than that. |
| The premise here is kind of convoluted, but let me
try and get it down into a few words. One of the couples wants to have
children and they haven’t been able to make any. So, they’re thinking of
getting a divorce because if they can’t have kids, well, what’s the point
of staying together? To determine whether or not they should divorce, they
want to go to Eden, the super-resort of resorts, especially for those in
need of couples counseling. They can’t afford to go there on their own,
but four couples together can go for half-price as a group.
Since Eden supposedly has an incredibly long waiting list of desperate couples, and since the package gives each couple the same benefits a single couple would receive, the bad writing is already starting to show. It continues. Promised nothing but jet skis, dancing and never-ending fun, the octet arrives to discover that they have signed up for only a smidgen of fun each day, preceded by endless and often silly counseling sessions. Did the first couple lie to the others, or did Eden lie to them all? This is never explained, and this is only the beginning. I could go on picking at nits, but essentially, that’s the problem in a nutshell. There is nothing clever or unexpected in this movie. When you don’t have a very funny movie on your hands as a creator, your job is to do one of two things. You either have to provide the audience with at least one really tremendous belly-laugh, or one perfectly poignant moment that leaves everyone in tears. In other words, you have to send people out of the theater with the memory of that moment of cleansing laughter, or heart-wrenching warmth. As you might guess, this film has neither. Now, I’m not saying this movie is bad. It’s just ordinary. It simply never builds up any steam, and it should have been able to do so. It certainly has a competent cast. The line-up includes Vince Vaughn, Jason Bateman, Jon Favreau, Malin Akerman, Kristin Davis, Kristen Bell, Faizon Love, and one of my all-time favorites, the stupendous Jean Reno. This is not a terrible bunch. But, actors still need something to work with, and these folks were not handed much in the way of tools. The reason this one is so hard for me to get a handle on is because it’s one of those films where you think that any second it’s going to get good. It seems such a perfect set-up that, well, the jokes are going to start any minute now ... any minute ... But, they don’t. In fact, instead of delivering any true warmth or comedy, all too often the film slides into the cheapest of gutter humor. The language is clean, but the insinuations are fairly crude. Couple that with writing that goes down one faulty path after another, lackluster scenes that don’t weave one into another, and at least two couples you simply will not be able to believe could possibly stay with each other, and what you have is a film that might be worth leaving on if you come across it while looking for something to play in the background while you fold clothes or knit, or whatever--at best. Despite its massive effort to be up-to-date with its references to Twitter and Guitar Hero and the such, this is simply an average film, an episode of a sit-com, and not one of the better ones, either. In fact, if it’s a choice between a repeat of "The Big Bang Theory" or this ... stick with CBS, Mondays at 9:30. Our final word: 2 stars out of 5. |
The Filmmakers:
Directed by Peter Billingsly
Screenplay by Jon Favreau, Vince Vaughn and Dana Fox
Released by Universal Pictures
![]() |
Well, here we to again. Lately it seems all
I’m interested in is comedies. A number of them have been horror/comedy
mixes, but I have been waiting for someone to deliver a straight, direct
laughfest. The wait is over.
"St. Trinian’s" is the United Kingdom’s third highest grossing independent film of all time. There’s a reason for that. This is, simply put, one of the funniest movies ever made. Just imagine taking the best things about "The Facts of Life," "Hogan’s Heroes" and "Monty Python’s Flying Circus," and you have a beginning of an idea of what this incredibly inventive film is all about. The Story: The film starts with a sad scene. A young girl is being left at a new school, St. Trinian’s, a once revered institution of higher learning, now not quite so reputable as in the past. Her father is related to the headmistress Camilla Fritton (Rupert Everett), and he is dumping his little girl in what, even in the opening minutes of the film, looks to be a school comprised of equal parts death trap and insane asylum. The girl is utterly horrified, and she has good reason to be. Her fellow classmates appear to be not only armed but homicidal. They are split into various extreme groups--Goths, geeks, beauty queens, commandos--none of which appear anything but hostile. The faculty is comprised of dysfunctional lunatics and their curriculum is the stuff of madness. |
| After the school is introduced, next comes its nemesis.
The newly appointed Minister of Education (Colin Firth) has been brought
in to clean up Britain’s sorry education system. Fresh from completely
overhauling the UK’s prison system, he seems the right man for the job.
His big idea: find the worst school in the empire and shut it down. After
that, the others will roll over and do what they’re told. Picking the obvious,
St. Trinian’s, the minister heads out to do just that, and then discovers
something upon which he had not counted. St. Trinian’s is run by his ex-lover.
This is when the comedy kicks into high-gear.
Everett is funny enough in the opening of the film playing both the father
of the young girl being abandoned at St. Trinian’s as well as the school’s
headmistress. But, when Everett is then revealed to be the old flame of
Firth, jaws begin to drop and laughter ensues.
This is an amazingly inventive film on a number
of levels. First, the story-telling is crisp and clean. There is no wasted
time what-so-ever. The actors, from the lead stars down to the youngest
girls are all perfect for their roles. Second: the humor is dry and relentless.
As usual, what would seem the perfect set-up for endless naughty jokes
to Hollywood is used far more in the manner of a teen comedy such as "Mean
Girls." The older students might be wearing a lot of sexy school girl costumes,
but there is nothing of the vulgar going on on screen. The
editing is especially noteworthy in this one as well. Indeed, coupled with
a highly intelligent soundtrack, every time a song begins the film almost
turns into a rock video. This is a you-can’t -take-your-eyes -off- the-screen-for-a-second
kind of film. Fast-paced, stylish to the max, wickedly funny and intelligently
told, it has the chance to be the surprise hit of the year. And, since
the sequel to it is already in the works, it just might be the surprise
hit of next year as well.
|
| Back in the 1950’s, Ealing Studios in England put
out all those mad slapstick laugh-provoking motion pictures. One of them,
“THE BELLES OF ST. TRINIAN’S,” spawned several sequels. Who can forget
Alastair Sim in his dual role of female headmistress of this wacky girls’
school and the “educator’s” brother, a bookie who wants to use the school
to his advantage. It was an hilarious filmization of Ronald Searle’s cartoons
about this completely crazy school for girls.
Now it has been remade and updated to the present
time and simply called, “ST. TRINIAN’S.” In the dual role is Rupert Everett
with Colin Firth as the Minister of Education who wants to close down this
worst school in all of Britain.
Modern music and updated technology that the girls use are utilized in this production, and these females are all whizzes at technology. It’s sort of a “Mission Impossible” endeavor with actual references to Tom Cruise and his first film in that particular series. A rather large and mostly recognizable cast does quite well putting forth the fun. Direction is by Oliver Parker and Barnaby Thompson. There’s a great deal that hits the mark in hilarity, while at other times misses by a great deal. I understand this film’s sequel, “THE LEGEND OF FRITTON’S GOLD” is currently in pre-production. “ST. TRINIAN’S” is the UKs third highest grossing independent film, according to press notes. I’ll admit, it’s good for numerous laughs in its machinations, but do yourselves a favor and get the four DVD set of the original films - treasures of British cinema not to be overlooked. |
The Filmmakers:
Directed by Oliver Parker and Barnaby Thompson
Based on “The Belles of St. Trinians” and inspired by the original film
series.
Director of Photography: Gavin Finney
Music by Charlie Mole
Released by NeoClassics films
![]() |
The use of two knives to make a peanut butter and
jelly sandwich may seem to some hilarious. It causes a very stupid argument
between two young people who live in love together in Manhattan. “PETER
AND VANDY” shows their trials and tribulations as the film flashes back
and forth through the various times in their lives together. The give and
take between the two is well shown along with what makes each “tick” in
this relationship. We get to know the couple through their eating habits,
their interacting together, and their actual living in the one apartment.
Jason Ritter and Jess Weixler play the two and posses that special chemistry together making this film work for the viewer as they love with great affection and also battle viciously. This two character drama is based on the stage play that was also written and directed by this film’s writer-director, Jay DiPietro. Other minor characters have been added to this film version to “open it up” for the motion picture medium with well shot outdoor settings and other interiors other than the place where the couple lives. |
| Going from strangers to lovers incurring manipulation,
“PETER AND VANDY” is a love story told out of order as far as scene continuity
is concerned as it flashes back and forth in their lives.. We are shown
people as they really are with those small moments in the past that impact
upon how they are now after a period of time has passed. Why they are and
why they stay together are easy for the viewing audience to understand
as the film jumps back and forth, here and there, in their relationship.
For them living chronologically, all is not quite as obvious as it is to
us.
“PETER AND VANDY” gives much food for thought as your mind goes back to those little incidents in your own life when those certain moments gave relevance to your now existence. Shot in 17 days in New York City, it’s truly a tale about the Big Apple and those living life here. |
The Filmmakers:
Written and Directed by Jay DiPietro based on his play.
Director of Photography: Frank G. De Marco
A Strand Films release
An Education Reviewed by Andrew Johnson
![]() |
We’re in a London suburb in 1962, pre-Beatles, sexual
liberation awakening time. England’s society after the war is still in
a buttoned-up state. Jenny (marvelously played by newcomer Carey Mulligan,
a kind of look-a-like to Tom Cruise’s wife Katy Holmes), on the cusp of
her 17th birthday, is waiting for a bus after school with her viola in
its case in the pouring rain. Suddenly a young man about 30, much older
than she, drives by offering her a ride home. This immediately should set
off the bells and whistles, but he’s so charismatic, charming, personable,
and sophisticated that she accepts. What do you know? He turns out to be
the consummate gentleman.
A romance begins with this David (Peter Sarsgaard) as he manages to take her to concerts, jazz clubs, restaurants, and out of the hum-drum existence of life which she’s been leading. It’s an entirely new awakening for her. Even her parents (Alfred Molina and Cara Seymour) are so charmed and taken by his demeanor that they even permit her to travel with him to Paris on a weekend, accompanied by his “Aunt Helen,” a person who really doesn’t exist but is in reality the paramour (Rosamund Pike) of his best friend and compatriot Danny (Dominic Cooper). |
| We observe that everyone seems to make compromises
in order to cope with the existence of life in its present circumstances,
as compromises in morality will be made as well. Based on a true story,
a magazine article memoir by Lynn Barber, “AN EDUCATION” is a well constructed
and directed motion picture with great authenticity as to time and era.
Jenny’s family wants to send her, a bright student, to Oxford for “reading
literature.” Never are they seen pushing her, as was the norm of that day,
to seek a young man for marriage.
Once Jenny gets a taste of the good life which David shows her, she’s hooked on him, even though certain dealings of his, which she observes, should set off alarms for her as the facade of this perfect man begins to show dents in his armor of goodness. The truth will probably hit her like a ton of bricks, causing Jenny to go from a bright-eyed school girl to a sophisticated young lady and then back to her questioning who she really is and if she truly knows herself. Disappointed that this young girl will simply throw away her gifts for that certain chance of higher education are her prep school English teacher Miss Stubbs (Olivia Williams) and the school’s headmistress (Emma Thompson). This also factors into what will eventually be the path for Jenny to pursue. We question whether David will be the making of Jenny or her undoing. Innocence and the loss of innocence is what this tale is all about. “AN EDUCATION” won the American Choice Award and the Cinematography Award at the 2009 Sundance Film Festival. It is a good “meaty” film, a throwback to a time gone by, giving much food for thought and showing how individuals reacted back then; a wonderful moral tale of making something of yourself. Life may deal you the severest of blows but you can pick yourself up and succeed. |
The Filmmakers:
Directed by Lone Scherfig
Screenplay by Nick Hornby Adapted from a memoir by Lynn Barber
Director of Photography: John DeBorman
Music composed by Paul Englishby
A Sony Pictures Classics release of a BBC Films presentation
![]()

![]()
Copyright 2009 Black Cat Media
Associates, Ltd
All rights reserved.